Intro to Ancient Near East: Akkad

It’s been a while since I posted any introductory posts. I thought I’d briefly write about one of my favorite stelae from the ancient Near East period, the Victory Stele of Naram-Sin (shown below, 2254-2218 BC).

The Akkadians were a group of people which took over Sumer in 2334 BC. The Akkadians spoke a Semitic language but used cuneiform (the Sumerian writing system) for their written documents. What I think is most fascinating about the Akkadians is their ideological shift in regards to divine rulers – halfway into the long reign of Naram-Sin (r. 2254-2218 BC), this king decided to heighten his political status by assuming divine status as well.1 There is visual evidence of this ideological shift on the Victory Stele of Naram-Sin, for the king is depicted wearing a horned headdress, a feature which was “formerly the exclusive prerogative of the gods.”2

This pink sandstone stele is my favorite piece of Akkadian art. It is one of the first pieces of art to depict an actual historial event; the stele commemorates Naram-Sin’s victory over the Lullubi people.

Hierarchy of scale is used in this composition, which means that the most important figure (in this case, Naram-Sin), is shown bigger than anyone else. Naram-Sin is walking up the mountainside, with his smaller soldiers marching behind him. If you look closely, you can see that Naram-Sin is treading on top of two fallen Lullubi soldiers.

The thing I like most about this stele are the stars depicted at the top. There are only two stars shown because the top of the stele is damaged, but it is thought that at least three favorable stars shown on the king. I read a footnote here which mentions that once there may have been seven stars on this stele.

I’ve had professors posit different ideas about these stars. Some think that the two depicted stars represent the dieties Shamash (the primary diety for the Akkadians) and Ishtar (the goddess of love, marriage, beauty and war). Therefore, the inclusion of these stars could indicate the gods’ favorable view of Naram-Sin. It also could be that Naram-Sin is walking up the mountainside in order to make a sacrifice to the gods, thanking them for his victory (which further propagandizes that Naram-Sin has divine support). This theme (the relationship between rulers and diety) is familiar in ancient art, which makes me think that this theory has some creedence. But if there were other stars depicted on this stele, which gods did they represent? How can we ensure that the attribution of gods to stars is not arbitrary?

I’ve had another professor who wondered if these stars could represent an actual cosmic event that took place during the battle or victory. I think this is a really interesting thought, though I don’t believe there is any extant evidence to support this idea. It’s kind of fun to think about, though. Since this stele was one of the first pieces of art to depict a historical event, it’s fun to think that historical accuracy extended to a depiction of what the stars looked like.

What do you think about these stars? What’s your favorite part about this stele?

1 Dominique Collon
, et al. “Mesopotamia.” In Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online, http://www.oxfordartonline.com.erl.lib.byu.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T057228pg2, accessed 7 August 2009.

2 Ibid.

  • heidenkind says:

    I'm really interested in Ancient Near East art, although I haven't had a chance to study it very much. I read about the stars that they represented gods like Ishtar and Shamash. I don't think the stelae is a strong argument for the divinity of the king, though. If Naram-Sin was claiming divinity, wouldn't his head be on the same level as the stars? Personally I think he was assuming a role of either being appointed by or serving as an intermediary between the gods and men, since he's the figure that literally stands between them and everyone else on the stelae.

  • e says:

    I think that's really beautiful.

    I kind of like your second professor's idea for the stars. I'm with you in that it probably isn't likely, but I like the magical feel of it — it kind of takes me into a day dream of what things must have looked like.

  • M says:

    heidenkind, I've also thought about how the stele could represent the king as a type of intermediary, since he is physically between the gods (if they are symbolized by the stars) and men.

    Personally, I am quite convinced that the horned headdress is a direct indication that the Naram-Sin was perceived as a god. But if that's the case, then it seems confusing why Naram-Sin is not on the same level as the stars (like you mentioned). This makes me wonder if the stars might not represent gods. Or, it also makes me wonder if a lot of stars were included in the original stele, and there may have been stars which extended down the left side of the stele (close to Naram-Sin's head). If so, that might have put Naram-Sin on the same level with the stars/gods. Hmm.

  • Hazar says:

    I wouldn't say he is divine because of horns, it's a symbol of power at first (see Alexander).
    Akkads have those stars in every divine ceremonials, i believe they are represantation of gods because of this. We know that they were worshipping to sky instead of earth so this makes sense.
    I asked this about my teacher, she was so stubborn about Naram-Sin being god though because of the writings, i would say those were dated after Naram-Sin for legitimating the idea of god-king

Email Subscription

An email notification will be sent whenever a new post appears on this site.
Name
Email *

Archives

About

This blog focuses on making Western art history accessible and interesting to all types of audiences: art historians, students, and anyone else who is curious about art. Alberti’s Window is maintained by Monica Bowen, an art historian and professor.