The Un-Peplos Kore

Tonight I’ve been researching why the so-called “Peplos Kore” (c. 530 BCE, shown left) might not be wearing a peplos garment. (A “peplos” is a rectangle of cloth that is pinned at the shoulders and worn with a belt – it gives the effect that the woman is wearing a blouse. And “kore” means young woman; it is a name given to certain female statues made by the Greeks.)

This current “un-peplos” argument is based on recent reconstructions and studies of the figurine. Instead of a peplos, it is thought that the statue is wearing a long robe, cape, and an ependytes (an outer garment which is a metal-like sheath divided into regular, rectangular compartments).1 The ependytes was an Eastern garment associated with divine power, and therefore suggests that this figurine would have represented some type of goddess, perhaps Artemis or Athena.

This argument has been solidified by the recent reconstructions of the Peplos Kore by German archaeologist Vincenz Brinkmann.2 I suppose that now the problem is to try and ascertain which goddess could be depicted. The statue’s missing right hand probably held some object to help ascertain her identity (like a bow for Artemis). Brinkmann favors the idea that the goddess is Artemis (although alternate theories have been presented by others).3 Anyhow, here are some possible ideas presented in reconstructions of the Peplos Kore:

Reconstruction of Peplos Kore (as Athena) by Vincenz Brinkmann, 2004
I really like the animals shown on this ependytes, but I can’t tell what if a mythological narrative is depicted in the reconstruction. I kind of doubt it. But if anyone wants to have a guess at what might be depicted, you can click here to see better details of this reconstruction.
Reconstruction of Peplos Kore (as Artemis) by Vincenz Brinkmann, 2004

Reconstruction of Peplos Kore by Cambridge University; first painted in 1975, repainted in 1996

Although this last image is of an older reconstruction, I thought I would still include it. As mentioned here, this Cambridge reconstruction supports the idea that the statue represents someone who is offering a gift (which looks like an apple or pomegranate) to the gods (instead of actually representing a goddess, as argued by Brinkmann). She is shown as wearing a meniskos, an umbrella designed to protect the statue against the weather and bird droppings.
I don’t know if we’ll ever have a concrete idea of what this statue looked like in terms of color and the ependytes design. There just aren’t enough paint samples for us to have a completely accurate reconstruction. Plus, it will be hard to know specific details unless we ever come across the kore’s missing arm/hand. But it’s fun to think of the how this sculpture might have appeared (and who actually was represented!).

1 Richard T. Neer, The Emergence of the Classical Style in Greek Sculpture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010), 119. Source available online here.

2 Ibid. You also can read an English review of Brinkmann’s publication here (review by by Brunilde Sismondo Ridgway). Be sure to check out the penultimate paragraph and footnote #12 to find out more information about the Peplos Kore argument.

3 See Brunilde Sismondo Ridgway review (Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2004.08.07), footnote #12.

  • H Niyazi says:

    Very interesting M! It seems like you are still fascinated by the painted sculpture of antiquity.

    These early Greek figures are so reminiscent of Egyptian sculpture – I wonder what degree of influence there may have been from Egypt to Greece.


  • Kiersten says:

    I think it's interesting that some of these reconstructions have elements attached to the kore's head. Do you know if the Peplos Kore has any sort of markings that would indicate a piece attached to her head that had broken off? I guess I just always assumed that her head was in good enough condition to indicate that she wasn't wearing any kind of headpiece. Unless maybe it was made out of a different kind of material, like metal, and placed on her head as a separate piece. Anyway, I like how the various reconstructions each make her look so different.

  • heidenkind says:

    Kiersten~I think there's a hole on top of her head or something like that. I know the head of Inanna from Uruk has a slot that held a wig or a crown.

    The older reconstruction always makes me think the not-a-peplos kore has an umbrella sticking out of her head. ;)

  • M says:

    Thanks for the comments! Yeah, Kiersten, there are a couple of holes where the kore would have had metal attachments. Brunilde Sismondo Ridgway mentions several holes in an article she wrote in 1977 ("The Peplos Kore, Akropolis 679" The Journal of the Walters Art Gallery," p. 56-57). In particular, she mentions that thirty-five holes (in two rows) surrounding the entire head. Some of these holes still preserve the lead pins which originally fastened the head ornament in place!

    Ridgway discusses how the holes of the inner row are evenly spaced, whereas the outer row are spaced and irregular intervals. These detailed layout of holes seems to suggest that the head ornament was rather elaborate. Bridgway also mentions that there were remains of a meniskos (umbrella) found. Perhaps the statue had a head ornament and a meniskos.

  • Kiersten says:

    Interesting. Thanks!

Email Subscription

An email notification will be sent whenever a new post appears on this site.
Email *



This blog focuses on making Western art history accessible and interesting to all types of audiences: art historians, students, and anyone else who is curious about art. Alberti’s Window is maintained by Monica Bowen, an art historian and professor.